IFRS vs VAS (Part 2): Gaining Insight into the differences

In the previous article "IFRS vs VAS (Part 1): An Overview of Key Differences", we provided an overview of the key differences between the two accounting standard systems - the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and the Vietnamese Accounting Standards (VAS). In this article, we will delve deeper into the comparison, exploring the specific differences in the recognition, valuation of financial items, as well as the reporting requirements between IFRS vs VAS. This will be a highly informative topic, so be sure not to miss out on this insightful piece!

IFRS vs VAS (Part 2)

Conceptual Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements

The Conceptual Framework and VAS 01 (General Accounting Standard) serve as the fundamental foundations for financial reporting globally and within Vietnam, respectively.


The Conceptual Framework provides a comprehensive set of concepts, principles, and objectives that underpin accounting standards worldwide. It establishes a common language and consistent framework for financial reporting, ensuring transparency, comparability, and reliability of financial information across jurisdictions.


On the other hand, VAS 01 holds great significance in the Vietnamese context, as it provides specific guidance and requirements tailored to the local accounting practices and regulatory environment. VAS 01 plays a crucial role in ensuring the accuracy, consistency, and relevance of financial reporting within Vietnam.


Below is a comparison table between Conceptual Framework vs VAS 01 (General Accounting Standard):

Conceptual Framework

VAS 01

The Conceptual Framework is not classified as an accounting standard.

VAS 01 is one of the standards and is numbered like other standards under VAS. Its content corresponds to the Conceptual Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements under IFRS.

The substance of accounting principles is more important than their form.

This principle has not been updated.

(Circular 200/2014/TT-BTC has stipulated this issue similar to international practice)

In addition to the historical cost method, the Conceptual Framework also stipulates several other asset and liability valuation methods such as current value, present value of expected future cash flows, and net realizable value.

Not been mentioned in Standard

It addresses the concepts of capital and capital maintenance for enterprises.

Not been mentioned in Standard

Accounting Standard on Inventories (IAS 2 and VAS 2)

While Vietnam has issued Accounting Standard No. 02 - Inventories (VAS 02) to correspond with the International Accounting Standard on Inventories IAS 02 under IFRS, there are still some key differences between IFRS vs VAS that need to be considered when applying these two standards:

Criteria

IAS 02

VAS 02

Example

Scope

  • Exclusions from the scope of application include financial instruments, biological assets related to agricultural activity, and agricultural produce at the point of harvest. These assets are covered by separate standards such as IAS 41 - Agriculture, IFRS 9 - Financial Instruments, etc.
  • Financial instruments and biological assets are presented separately from the Inventories line item on the financial statements.
  • Agricultural produce at the point of harvest is presented under the Inventories line item on the financial statements, similar to VAS 02.
  • Derivatives, biological assets related to agricultural activities, and agricultural produce at the time of harvest are all covered under the general scope of VAS 02.
  • Financial instruments and biological assets related to agricultural activities are presented together under the Inventories line item on the financial statements.

The unique characteristics of agricultural produce and biological assets often have long growth and maturation cycles, and their values can change continuously. The value of agricultural produce and biological assets is often difficult to reliably determine based on historical cost or production costs. Therefore, according to IAS 41, these assets are valued at Fair Value Less Costs to Sell.

In contrast, under VAS 02, agricultural produce and biological assets are valued similarly to other inventory items, determined based on historical cost principles, which does not accurately reflect the constantly fluctuating true values of these assets.

The recognition criteria

Equipment, tools and instruments that meet the recognition criteria for tangible fixed assets (Property, Plant and Equipment), are recognized as Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE), without the need to consider the asset's value.

Assets with original cost below 30 million VND (as per current regulations), such as tools, equipment, etc., are recognized as Inventory.


Initial Recognition

Agricultural produce harvested from biological assets is recognized at fair value less estimated costs to sell at the point of harvest.
Recognized at Actual Production Cost.


Measurement subsequent to initial recognition

Inventory value is determined based on Net Realizable Value.
When the Net Realizable Value of Inventory is less than the Cost, an allowance for decline in inventory value is established on an individual inventory item basis.


Cost calculation method

  • The same costing method is applied for inventory items of similar nature and intended use.
  • Inventory groups with different characteristics may apply different costing methods.
The same costing method is applied for all inventory items.


Biological assets related to agricultural activity are covered by separate standards IAS 41 - Agriculture (IFRS vs VAS)

Biological assets related to agricultural activity are covered by separate standards IAS 41 - Agriculture

Accounting Standard on Tangible Fixed Assets (IAS 16 and VAS 03)

Accounting Standard No. 03 - Tangible Fixed Assets (VAS 03) is issued corresponding to the International Accounting Standard on Property, Plant and Equipment (hereinafter referred to as PPE) (IAS 16). There are some notable differences between VAS 03 and IAS 16 in the recognition and measurement of tangible assets. The following is a detailed comparison of the differences between IAS vs VAS related to Tangible Fixed Assets:

Criteria

IAS 16

VAS 03

Example

Scope

  • Exclude the scope of application for Biological Assets related to agricultural activities, which have been separately regulated in IAS 41 - Agriculture.
  • Exclude assets arising from exploration and evaluation activities (separately regulated in IFRS 6 Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources).
  • Exclude Property, Plant and Equipment classified as held for sale, which are specifically regulated under IFRS 5 - Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations.

Does not exclude.

 

Industrial crops such as rubber, coffee, etc. or breeding livestock such as dairy cows, pigs, etc. have a process of growth and reproduction during the growth process. The directly related costs such as breeding, planting cannot reflect the value of these specific assets. IAS 41 requires biological assets to be recognized at Fair Value Less Costs to Sell, while VAS 03 requires recognition at historical cost, which are the directly related costs of breeding and planting these assets. Therefore, under VAS 03, biological assets are not properly reflected in the financial statements.

The recognition criteria

Recognition of PPE that is purchased, but the PPE itself does not generate economic benefits, but is necessary to enable other assets to generate economic benefits.

There is no similar requirement.

A chemical manufacturer may install new chemical processing procedures to comply with environmental requirements for the production and storage of hazardous chemicals; the related upgrades to the plant are recognized as an asset because without them, the entity cannot produce and sell the chemicals.


Expected to be used for more than one period.
Estimated useful life of more than 1 year. 



There is no standard for the value of tangible fixed assets.

Must meet the required value criteria under current regulations.

According to Circular 45/2013/TT-BTC , the original cost of fixed assets must be 30 million VND or higher.

Initial Recognition

Include the costs of dismantling, removing and restoring the asset in the initial recognition value of PPE.

Do not include the costs of dismantling, removing and restoring the asset in the initial recognition value of PPE.

A company purchases an old office building and plans to renovate and refurbish the building for use.

According to IFRS, the expected costs of dismantling, removing the parts of the old building, and restoring the site after the completion of the renovation work must be included in the initial purchase price of the office building.


These costs may include:


  • Costs of hiring services to dismantle, remove old materials and equipment
  • Costs of transporting and handling the excess materials
  • Costs of site leveling and site restoration after the work is completed

When recognizing the building asset, the company will add these costs to the initial purchase price of the building. These costs will be depreciated together with the building over the useful life of the asset.

Measurement subsequent to initial recognition

Allowed to choose 1 of the following 2 models when determining the value of PPE:

  • Revaluation model at fair value.
  • Cost model.

If choose the revaluation model at fair value, it must be applied to all PPE within the same class of assets.

Only the cost model is allowed to be used to determine the value of tangible fixed assets. Except in cases of equitization, contributing assets as capital, or dissolution, division, or merger.

According to VAS, fixed assets are typically recognized using the cost model. However, this does not always accurately reflect the true value and earning potential of the asset. 

For example: Vinalines' buoy 83M has a book value of hundreds of billions of Vietnamese dong, but the actual economic benefits generated are very low. Conversely, some real estate fixed assets may have increased significantly in value compared to their original cost. Solely recording fixed assets at cost without revaluation can lead to significant discrepancies that do not accurately reflect the true potential of the business.


Each component of a PPE (Property, Plant, and Equipment) that has a significant cost relative to the total cost of the asset must be depreciated separately.

There is no clear regulation on the depreciation cost for each significant component within a PPE.

The aircraft frame and engine can be depreciated separately, as both of these components have a significant value relative to the total original cost of the aircraft.


Recognize the loss from impairment of PPE (Property, Plant, and Equipment) in the Income Statement in the period the loss is incurred.

Not been mentioned in Standard


Accounting standards on Intangible Assets (IAS 38 and VAS 04)

Vietnamese Accounting Standard 04 - Intangible Assets (VAS 04) corresponds to the International Accounting Standard on Intangible Assets (IAS 38). Below are some key differences between these two standards: 

Criteria

IAS 38

VAS 04
Scope

Exclude assets arising from exploration and evaluation activities (these are covered separately under IFRS 6 Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources).

Does not exclude.


According to international practice, Land and perpetual land use rights are considered tangible fixed assets (PPE).

Land use rights are intangible fixed assets.

Measurement subsequent to initial recognition

Allowed to choose 1 of the following 2 models when determining the value of PPE:

  • Revaluation model at fair value.
  • Cost model.

However, the revaluation model is often not applied as the active market for intangible fixed assets usually does not exist or is very rare.

Determine according to the cost model.


It does not specify a definite number of years for the depreciation of assets.

The depreciation period does not exceed 20 years, unless there is convincing evidence that a useful life of more than 20 years is appropriate.

In VAS, the depreciation period of Intangible assets does not exceed 20 years

In VAS, the depreciation period of Intangible assets does not exceed 20 years

Accounting standards on Investment Properties (IAS 40 and VAS 05)

Vietnam has issued Accounting Standard No. 05 - Investment Properties (VAS 05) corresponding to the International Accounting Standard on Investment Properties (IAS 40). Generally, there are not many differences between these two standards. One notable difference between these two standards IFRS vs VAS:

  • IAS 40 allows the measurement of the value after initial recognition of investment property using one of two models:  The fair value model and the cost model. For the fair value model, gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of the asset will be recognized in the Income Statement for the period.
  • VAS 04 only allows the value of investment property to be determined using the cost model. Circular 200 provides additional guidance for investment property held for capital appreciation, but only for investment property that has decreased in value, and recognizes the loss in Cost of Goods Sold. Other types of investment property are not recognized under the fair value model.

measurement of the value after initial recognition of investment property using one of two models: The fair value model and the cost model (IFRS vs VAS)

IAS 40 allows the measurement of the value after initial recognition of investment property using one of two models: The fair value model and the cost model

Accounting standards on Leases (IFRS 16 and VAS 06)

Accounting Standard VAS 06 on Leases was originally issued based on the previous international standard IAS 17. However, in 2019 the IASB introduced a new global standard, IFRS 16 Leases, which replaced IAS 17 and introduced significant changes.

Some of the notable differences between IFRS vs VAS: Accounting for Leases:

Criteria

IFRS 16

VAS 06

Classification of Leases​

Elimination of the distinction between finance leases and operating leases.

Distinction between finance leases and operating leases


The criteria for recognizing leased assets are not dependent on ownership, but rather emphasize the right of control to obtain economic benefits.

The criteria for recognizing leased assets are dependent on the enterprise's ownership rights in the lease contract.

Initial Recognition

The lessee recognizes a Right-of-Use Asset and a Lease Liability.

  • Right-of-use asset: At the commencement date, a lessee shall measure the right-of-use asset at cost.
  • Lease liability: At the commencement date, a lessee shall measure the lease liability at the present value of the lease payments that are not paid at that date. The lease payments shall be discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease, if that rate can be readily determined. If that rate cannot be readily determined, the lessee shall use the lessee’s incremental borrowing rate.
  • Operating lessee recognizes periodic lease payments as expenses. 
  • Finance lessee recognizes the leased asset and corresponding finance lease liability. ​

Measurement subsequent to initial recognition

The value of the right-of-use asset is recognized based on the cost model:

  • Cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses.
  • Adjusted for any remeasurement of the lease liability after the date the leased asset is available for use.
  • Operating leases: There are no specific regulations.
  • Finance leases: Similar to IFRS, however VAS does not consider impairment losses on the leased asset and does not remeasure the lease liabilities.


The lease liability is measured using the amortized cost method.

It is adjusted to increase or decrease the carrying amount to reflect the lease payments made and any reassessments or lease modifications.


Exemption from application

In the case of exemption for short-term leases under 12 months or low-value leases, the lease payments are recognized as expenses in the period or allocated over the lease term.

There is no optional exemption like in IFRS.

Accounting standards on revenue from contracts with customers (IFRS 15 and VAS 14)

Compared to the IFRS 15 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers, VAS 14 - Revenue and Other Revenue has many similarities in the principles of revenue recognition, such as the transfer of control and the matching of revenue with the performance of obligations. However, there are still many differences in the steps of recognition. Here are some notable differences when comparing these two standards:

​​Criteria

IFRS 15

VAS 14

Example

Scope

Applies to all Contracts with Customers, except for contracts within the scope of: 

  • IFRS 16 - Leases;
  • IFRS 17 - Insurance Contracts;
  • IFRS 9 - Financial Instruments
  • IFRS 10 - Consolidated Financial Statements,
  • IFRS 11 - Joint Arrangements,
  • IAS 27 - Separate Financial Statements
  • IAS 28 - Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures
Construction contracts are specifically covered under a separate standard, VAS 15 Construction Contracts



Contracts with customers are within the scope of IFRS 15 if they meet the 5 of following conditions:

  • The parties to the contract have approved the contract and are committed to perform their respective obligations;
  • The entity can identify the rights of each party regarding the goods or services to be transferred;
  • The entity can identify the payment terms for the goods or services to be transferred;
  • The contract has commercial substance;
  • It is probable that the entity will collect the consideration to which it is entitled in exchange for the goods or services to be transferred to the customer.

No specified.


Revenue Recognition

Revenue from Contract with customer is recognized following the 5-step model:

  1. Identify the Contract with the Customer;
  2. Identify the Performance Obligations in the Contract;
  3. Determine the Transaction Price;
  4. Allocate the Transaction Price to the Performance Obligations in the Contract;
  5. Recognize Revenue when (or as) the Entity satisfies a Performance Obligation.

No specified.

Assume a company enters into a contract with a customer to provide a product and a 2-year warranty service, with a total contract value of 1,000,000 VND.

Under IFRS 15:

  • Identified Performance Obligations: Selling the product and providing the 2-year warranty service are separate performance obligations.
  • Allocate Transaction Price: 900,000 VND to the product sale, 100,000 VND to the warranty service (based on standalone selling prices in a 9:1 ratio).
  • Recognize Revenue: Revenue from product sale is recognized when control transfers to the customer. Revenue from warranty service is recognized over the 2-year period.

Under VAS 14:

  • Revenue is recognized when the company has transferred the significant risks and rewards of ownership to the customer, and no longer retains control over the goods.
  • The full 1,000,000 VND in revenue is recognized upon product delivery, with no separate allocation to the warranty service.


IFRS focuses on the transfer of control to the customer, rather than the transfer of risks and rewards, as the key criterion for revenue recognition.

The key conditions for revenue recognition are:

  • The risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the buyer; and
  • Collection of the consideration is reasonably assured.


Accounting standards on borrowing costs (IAS 23 and VAS 16)

Borrowing costs are interest and other costs that an entity incurs in connection with the borrowing of funds. Vietnam has issued Accounting Standard VAS 16, which corresponds to the International Accounting Standard IAS 23 on Borrowing Costs. Fundamentally, the two standards are similar. However, there are still some differences that need to be clearly understood when applying these two standards.

Criteria

IAS 23VAS 16

Definition of Borrowing Costs

Borrowing costs include:

  • Interest expense calculated using the effective interest method as described in IFRS
  • Interest in respect of lease liabilities recognised in accordance with IFRS 16 Leases; and
  • Exchange differences arising from foreign currency borrowings to the extent that they are regarded as an adjustment to interest costs.

Borrowing costs do not include exchange differences arising from foreign currency borrowings to the extent that they are regarded as an adjustment to interest costs.

Definition of Qualifying Assets

Unlike VAS, IAS 23 does not specify a specific period of more than 12 months as the definition of a "substantial period of time" for a qualifying asset. 

A qualifying asset is an asset that:

  • Is under construction or production, and
  • Takes a substantial period of time (more than 12 months) to get ready for its intended use or sale.

According IAS 23, Borrowing costs include exchange differences arising from foreign currency borrowings (IFRS vs VAS)

According IAS 23, Borrowing costs include exchange differences arising from foreign currency borrowings.

Accounting Standards on Business Combinations (IFRS 3 and VAS 11)

Vietnam has issued the Accounting Standard VAS 11 on Business Combinations, which is based on IAS 22. However, IAS 22 has since been replaced by IFRS 3 Business Combinations. There are several key differences between IFRS 3 and VAS 11:

Criteria

IFRS 3
VAS 11

Cost of Acquisition Achieved in a step acquisition​

  • If the business combination is achieved in stages, the acquirer shall remeasure its previously held equity interest in the acquiree at its acquisition-date fair value and recognise the resulting gain or loss, if any, in profit or loss.
  • Acquisition-related costs (e.g. advisory fees, legal,...) are excluded from the purchase price. The acquirer shall account for acquisition-related costs as expenses in the periods in which the costs are incurred and the services are received, with one exception.
  • The purchase price includes any contingent consideration payments. 
  • The cost of the business combination is the aggregate of the exchange transactions, without remeasuring to fair value at the date of gaining control (acquisition date or date of completing the business combination).
  • The purchase price is allowed to include directly related costs.
  • There are no similar requirements regarding contingent consideration payments.

The measurement and recognition of goodwill impairment

IFRS 3 provides the option to measure and recognize goodwill using either the full goodwill method (including the non-controlling interest's share) or the partial goodwill method. 

Goodwill is only associated with the parent company's ownership portion (Part goodwill).

Determination of goodwill impairment

It does not allow for the amortization of goodwill, but rather requires the annual assessment of goodwill impairment in accordance with IAS 36 Impairment of Assets.

Amortization of goodwill over a maximum period of 10 years.

IFRS requires the annual assessment of goodwill impairment (IFRS vs VAS)

IFRS requires the annual assessment of goodwill impairment

Conclusion

Through the article "IFRS vs VAS (Part 2): Gaining Insight into the differences", we provided an in-depth analysis of the key distinctions between IFRS vs VAS, particularly in the areas of recognition, asset valuation, and disclosure requirements. This knowledge equips enterprises with the necessary tools to effectively transition from VAS to IFRS and successfully implement the international standards.

However, it's important to note that this article does not cover all the differences between IFRS vs VAS. In addition to the differences highlighted, another notable distinction is that there are many VAS standards that have not yet been issued, compared to the more comprehensive set of standards under IFRS. The upcoming article "IFRS vs VAS (Part 3): Standards Yet to be Issued in Vietnam" will examine this aspect in more detail, providing further insights into the gaps between the two accounting frameworks. By continuing to explore these nuances, we aim to equip readers with a more complete understanding of the transition from VAS to IFRS.

FAQs

Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use.


Yes, there are some companies in Vietnam that have already started applying IFRS. Such as: Vingroup and Vinamilk

No, IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) is not only for public companies. IFRS can be adopted by both public and private companies, though the specific requirements and timelines for adoption may vary.

IFRS vs VAS (Part 2): Gaining Insight into the differences
Viindoo Technology Joint Stock Company, Phạm Thị Như Ý May 28, 2024

SHARE THIS POST